Contents
pdf Download PDF pdf Download XML
596 Views
494 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 1 Issue 1 (January, 2020) | Pages 9 - 14
Drainless Lipoabdominoplasty: My Experience in Bangladesh
1
FCPS, FRCS, FACS Consultant Plastic & Aesthetic Surgeon Institute: Cosmetic Surgery Centre Ltd & Bangladesh Specialized Hospital Ltd Dhaka, Bangladesh
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Sept. 5, 2019
Revised
Sept. 23, 2019
Accepted
Nov. 10, 2019
Published
Jan. 25, 2020
Abstract

Introduction: The use of drains during lipoabdominoplasty operation has been a routine procedure all along. This is done to prevent seroma formation. But there are problems associated with drains, such as, pain, difficulty in patient mobilization, blockage, and infection1. Strategies to prevent seroma has been tried2. But with improvement in dissection technique along with other strategies to prevent seroma, surgeons have now started to avoid using drains. The aim of this study is to see the incidence of complications especially when drain is not employed. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out in Cosmetic Surgery Centre Ltd and Bangladesh Specialized Hospital Ltd, Dhaka. Period of study 2y 06 month from June 2017 to December 2019. Number of Lipoabdominoplasties done was 47. Females were 44 and males were 03. All the patients were operated under spinal anesthesia except 3, in whom general anesthesia was applied for additional procedures Fascia Scarpa sparing lipoabdominoplasties were performed in all cases. No drains were used in 46 patients. But in one case, drain had to be employed due to excessive preoperative oozing. Postoperatively patients were evaluated for seroma formation, wound dehiscence, flap necrosis and infection. Results: Only 4 patients amongst drainless abdominoplasty had seroma formation and one patient in whom drain was used had a minor wound dehiscence. None of the patients had flap necrosis or infection. Early mobilization was easier in patients without drain. Conclusions: We found that sparing the infraumbilical fascia Scarpa during dissection along with wound closure without tension and avoidance of gliding surfaces with the use of quilting sutures can help avoid the use of drain in lipoabdominoplasty operation. Avoiding drains permits better patients comfort and early ambulation. 

Keywords
Lipoabdominoplasty, Drainless, Deroma
INTRODUCTION

Introduction

The use of drains during lipoabdominoplasty operation has been a routine procedure all along. This is done to prevent seroma formation. But there are problems associated with drains, such as, pain, difficulty in patient mobilization, blockage, and infection. Strategies to prevent seroma, such as the use of quilting sutures3,4 or tissue glues5 have all been employed. But with improvement in dissection technique along with other strategies to prevent seroma, surgeons have now started to avoid using drains. The anatomical basis (Fig 1) of modification of this surgical technique lies in anatomical knowledge of lymphatic drainage of the abdominal wall6. After attending the ISAPS congress in Miami in 2018 the author has become more convinced about drainless lipoabdominoplasty. In my centres drain is now used only in cases where it is absolutely indicated. The aim of this study is to see the incidence of complications especially when drain is not employed.

 

Figure :1 Anatomical basis depend on the lymphatic drainage. Infrumbilical fascia Scarpa carries the lymphatic channels to the inguinal lymph nodes

Materials and Methods

The study was carried out in Cosmetic Surgery Centre Ltd and Bangladesh Specialized Hospital Ltd, Dhaka. Period of study 2y 06 month from June 2017 to December 2019. Number of Lipoabdominoplasties done was 47. Females were 44 and males were 03. All the patients were operated under spinal anesthesia except 3, in whom general anesthesia was applied for additional procedures Fascia Scarpa sparing lipoabdominoplasties were performed in all cases. No drains were used in 46 patients. But in one case, drain had to be employed due to excessive preoperative oozing. Postoperatively patients were evaluated for seroma formation, wound dehiscence, flap necrosis and infection.

Table 1

 

Total number

47

Females

44

Males

03

Postoperative Care

All abdominoplasty surgeries alone or in combination with other procedures were advised breathing exercise and continued with sequential compression devise for lower limbs.

Typically, the patient ambulates with assistance within 24 hours after completion of surgery.

Routine follow-up is scheduled at 2 days, 6 days, 10 days, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 1 year after surgery (Fig 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11, 12). The abdominal binder / compression garment is placed and worn at all times except during showers for 6 weeks postoperatively.

Methods

Only four patients amongst drainless abdominoplasty had seroma formation and one patient in whom drain was used had a minor wound dehiscence. None of the patients had flap necrosis or infection. Early mobilization was easier in patients without drain.

 

Figure 5: Before and after Lipoabdominoplasty

 

 

Figure 6: Before and after Lipoabdominoplasty

 

Figure 7: Before and after Lipoabdominoplasty; significant reduction of stretch marks is noted

 

Figure 8: Before and after Lipoabdominoplasty

 

Figure 9: Before and after Lipoabdominoplasty and Ventral Hernia Repair

Figure 10: Post massive weight loss laxity of breast and abdomen, in a young lady; before and two weeks after Lipoabdominoplasty and Mastopexy.

Figure 11: Before and after Revision Lipoabdominoplasty with Umbilical Hernia repair

Figure 12: Same patient as in figure 11,front view

Procedure:

In the preoperative room, our warming protocol is started and continued throughout surgery and while in the recovery room. All patients receive lower extremity sequential compression devices7.

 

Table 2

Operative Sequence for Drainless Abdominoplasty

Step

Details

1

Marking (Fig 2)

2

Infiltration

3

Liposuction

4

Umbilical dissection (Fig 3)

5

Infraumbilical dissection with sub-Scarpal fat preservation

6

Supraumbilical dissection (Fig 4)

7

Excision of sub-Scarpal fat where diastasis recti repair will be performe (if indicated)

8

Vertical midline plication using No 1 prolene

9

Marking and excision of excess skin and f

10

Marking and incision of new position for the umbilicus

11

Closure of lower abdominal incision and inset of umbilicus

12

Application of dressings and abdominal bind

 

 

Figure 2: Preoperative Marking

 

Figure 3: Excess skin flap pulled down after detaching umbilicus

Figure 4: Extent of supra umbilical dissection

Complications

Complications were minimal and insignificant. Out of 47 lipoabdominoplsty cases 4 developed seroma. They were treated by needle aspiration; and none required reoperation. One patient in whom drain was used developed minor wound dehiscence; and it was repaired under local anesthesia. None of the patients had hematoma or infection. There was also no evidence of flap necrosis in any of the patients. (Table 3).

Table 3

 

Complications (n = 47)

Total

Hematoma

0

Seroma

4

Infection

0

Wound Dehiscence

1

Flap Necrosis

0

Discussion

The etiology of seroma formation following abdominoplasty is multifactorial8. Multiple strategies are employed to reduce this complication. Highlighted strategies include preservation of sub-Scarpal fat9, limited undermining of the abdominal flap and quilting sutures.

Preservation of sub-Scarpal fat may help obliteration of dead space and help adherence of the abdominal flap to the musculoaponeurotic abdominal wall. This strategy aims to reduce seroma formation through obliteration of dead space and prevention of shearing between the abdominoplasty flap and musculoaponeurotic abdominal wall.

It is important to combine liposuction of upper abdomen and waist area of the abominoplasty procedure, to ensure adequate postoperative flattening of the abdominal contour10.

Patients of BMI over 35 can also undergo drainless lipoabdominoplasty11. Post bariatric lipoabdominoplasty patients can also undergo drainless, without any additional risk of seroma formation. In 2018 Medha Anand Bhave Published a series of 204 cases done in 10 years, with only 1 case of seroma1 in the Indian journal of plastic surgery.

Even though most of the plastic surgeons around the globe are still using drains in every case, we have stopped using drains in lipoabdominoplasty operations. In our practice, we use drains only if it is absolutely indicated. Since we know the factors that contribute in seroma formation, it is important to focus on modifications of dissection technique, preservation of fascia Scarpa and other technical details in the steps of operation. It has been shown in multiple publications that paying attention to these modifications can significantly reduce the incidence of seroma.

Even if seroma forms, it can very easily treated by aspiration in the office setup. The procedure is painless, and patients hardly ever complain of the needle prick. It may have to be repeated 3 to 7 days later, but it is never a big deal for the surgeon or the patient.

We know that seromas form typically around 2 weeks after the surgery12. So, its futile to think that seromas can be prevented by the use of drains.

Conclusion

We found that sparing the infraumbilical fascia Scarpa during dissection along with wound closure without tension and avoidance of gliding surfaces with the use of quilting sutures can help avoid the use of drain in lipoabdominoplasty operations. Continuous use of pressure garment in the post operative period is also an important factor in avoidance of seroma formation. Avoiding drains permit early ambulation. And patient comfort is significantly better - especially when they are released home on the next day of surgery.

REFERENCES

1. Bhave, Medha Anand (Khair). "Can drains be avoid-ed in lipo-abdominoplasty?" Indian Journal of plastic surgery: official publication of the Association of Plas-tic Surgeons of India vol. 51,1 (2018): 15-23. doi:10.4103/ijps.IJPS_23_18. 2. Seretis K, Goulis D, Demiri EC, et al. "Prevention of seroma formation following abdominoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis." Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:316-323. -447. 3. Kathryn V. Isaac, Frank Lista, Mark P. Mcisaac, Jamil Ahmad, "Drainless Abdominoplasty Using Barbed Progressive Tension Sutures,." Aesthetic Sur-gery Journal, Volume 37, Issue 4, I April 2017, Pages 428-429, https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw241. 4. Jabbour S, Awaida C, Mhawej R, et al. "Does the ad-dition of progressive tension sutures to drains reduce seroma incidence after abdominoplasty?." A systemat-ic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:440-447. 5. Marwan W. Nasr, MD, Samer F. Jabbour, MD, Ra-chad I. Mhawej,MD, Joseph S. Elkhoury, MD, Fadi H. Sleilati, MD : "Effect of Tissue Adhesives on Seroma Incidence after Abdominoplasty." A Systemic Review and Meta-.Analysis. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Vol-ume 36, Issue 4, April 2016, Pages 450-458 6. Friedman T, Coon D, Kanbour-ShakirA Michaels J, Rubin JP, "Defining the lymphatic drainage of anterior abdominal wall: an anatomic study." Plast Recons Surg 2015;135;1027-32. 7. Ibrahim M, et al.Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct. Review Article. "Effect of Compression devices on preventing Deep Vein thrombosis among adult trauma patients." 8. Costa-Ferreira A, Rebelo M, Silva A, et al. "Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty: random-ized clinical study of efficacy and safety." Plast Re-constr Surg. 2013;131:644-651. 9. Tourani SS, Taylor GI, Ashton MW. "Scarpa fascia preservation in abdominoplasty; Does it preserve the lymphatics? " Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 136;258-62. 10. Matarasso A. "Liposuction as an adjunct to a full abdominoplasty revisited." Plast Reconstr surg. 2000; 106:1197 - 102.discussion 1203-5. (PubMed). 11. Batac J, Hamade M, Hamade H, Glickman L. "Ab-dominoplasty in the Obese Patient." Plastic and Recon-structive Surgery, 2019; 143 (4): 72le DOI: 10. 1097/PRS. 0000000000005413. 12. Ricardo Baroudi, MD. Carlos Albarto, Affonso Fer-reira, MD. Seroma: "How to avoid it and How to Treat It." Aesthetic surgery journal, v 18, Issue 6, Nov 1998, pages 439-441.

Recommended Articles
News Article
Information For the Authors
Published: 01/07/2021
Download PDF
Editorial
Breast Implant Associated Lymphoma – a Pressing Concern for Plastic Surgeons
Published: 01/06/2021
Download PDF
Perspective Article
Planning for the Resumption of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Practice During Covid Times
Published: 23/08/2020
Download PDF
Case Report
Fat Cyst Excision Followed by Breast Implant as Management of Complications of Lipotransfer for Breast Augmentation: A Case Report
Published: 25/01/2022
Download PDF
© Copyright Bangladesh Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons